Blog 1: My Initial Thought on Politics and Water


 My Initial Thought on Politics and Water

  
My initial thoughts on the relationship between Water and Politics is an incredibly development-focused idea. Currently, I am curious and confused as to why I think this relationship does not seem to be working. From previous readings and research, I think there is an ineffectiveness when it comes to the role of the state. Some questions I have are: Why is the distribution of water so difficult to achieve fairly? Why are some not yet able to secure stable water investments? What is being done to tackle water poverty on a national level and to what extent is it effective? Due to this, I cannot help but imagine a negative cycle in many countries when it comes to their water and development. 

Let me explain: water causes development (economic and social) and development increases access to water. Hence, my thoughts and confusions are with the countries that do not have the water (in terms of quantity, quality or affordability) to attract investments, nor do they have an initial appropriate level of (water) development to attract investment. For example, in smaller Ugandan towns 'low return on water and sanitation investments, a lack of feasible and cheap technological options to provide sanitation services inappropriate infrastructure and poor coordination remain key challenges (Nayebare et al, 2020: 99-100).' What do countries and their leaders do if their water sources are contaminated inhibiting development, while at the same time, they are to deal with their inability to attract investment to improve the quantity and/or quality of their water sources, on a national level? What do they do? This, to me, sounds like a conundrum - how do you develop as a society if you do not have the appropriate water sources, and simultaneously, there is an inability to increase or improve water sources due to a development in your society? What do you do in a situation where there is a lack of both water and development? 

Does this seemingly negative cycle of decline actually occur in real life? How is it mitigated for? Indeed, there is a key and growing role of privatisation in this debate (Thompson et al, 2000: 51), but I believe until everyone in the country can have access to an abundant source of clean water, the role of the state and its political affairs have just as much of a role as privatisation. 







Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 2: Initial Thoughts on Water and Politics Continued

Image
  Initial Thoughts on Water and Politics Continued  As I have continued to read on the topic of Water and Politics, I realise the inherent assumptions in my previous blog post. My main question was 'how do you develop as a society if you do not have the appropriate water sources, while there is an inability to increase to improve water sources due to the lack of development in your society?' My argument misses out on a key piece of information: while countries may be considered 'developing', their governments always have a money tree. Secondly, my question and thought process was not nuanced enough - I should have outlined specific 'water sources' that attract financial investment and increase development throughout a country. For example, many developing countries rely on agriculture for their livelihoods; therefore, many must rely on irrigation to some extent. The question is more about, do they have the development required for large-scale infrastructures tie...
Read more

Blog 3: COP27: 'Water Politics' or Just 'Politics'...

Image
COP27: 'Water Politics' or Just 'Politics'...  Csaba Kőrösi, the President of the UN General Assembly claimed the 2022 COP ‘ is the water COP .’ However, is this really true? Introduction:  Problems with the global water supply and distribution are inextricably linked to climate change - ‘ 3.6 billion people face inadequate access to water at least a month per year… [which] is expected to increase to more than 5 billion by 2050’. This is more than half of the entire population on Earth set to experience problems with access to water. Indeed, already 1 out of 10 people cannot rely on their water sources for clean water. This is set to increase as the consequences of climate change become more intense: more pollution, prolonged droughts, more dry wells and more dangerous weather events.  Africa is at the heart of the water crisis. It is said that ‘without accelerated action, ‘ 80% of African nations are unlikely to have sustainably managed water resources by 2030 .’ In f...
Read more

Blog 4: Unstable Futures: The Curse of the River Nile

Image
Blog 4: Unstable Futures: The Curse of the River Nile  Political History of the Nile:  The River Nile played a critical and strategic role in Egypt. It encouraged the blossoming of civilisations during the Pharaonic period, allowing the country to command great political power as ‘the part of Africa that receives its source of life ( Tayia et al, 2021: 299) .’ A short and concise history of Nile politics. The Nile politics we know today is very much influenced by the happenings of 19th and 20th-century European imperialism. Under British colonial rule, the River Nile was protected by the empire ( Swain, 2011: 690 ), which was also involved in the distribution of its waters, too. In 1959, it was decided that the downstream nations of Egypt and Sudan would get most of the Nile’s water, with ‘ 48 billion cubic metres going to Egypt and 4 billion to Sudan .’ This agreement also prevented Ethiopia from building dams along the river. The political obsession with the Nile continued ...
Read more