The Politics of Water

  Initial Thoughts on Water and Politics Continued  As I have continued to read on the topic of Water and Politics, I realise the inherent assumptions in my previous blog post. My main question was 'how do you develop as a society if you do not have the appropriate water sources, while there is an inability to increase to improve water sources due to the lack of development in your society?' My argument misses out on a key piece of information: while countries may be considered 'developing', their governments always have a money tree. Secondly, my question and thought process was not nuanced enough - I should have outlined specific 'water sources' that attract financial investment and increase development throughout a country. For example, many developing countries rely on agriculture for their livelihoods; therefore, many must rely on irrigation to some extent. The question is more about, do they have the development required for large-scale infrastructures tie

 My Initial Thought on Politics and Water    My initial thoughts on the relationship between Water and Politics is an incredibly development-focused idea. Currently, I am curious and confused as to why I think this relationship does not seem to be working. From previous readings and research, I think there is an ineffectiveness when it comes to the role of the state. Some questions I have are: Why is the distribution of water so difficult to achieve fairly? Why are some not yet able to secure stable water investments? What is being done to tackle water poverty on a national level and to what extent is it effective? Due to this, I cannot help but imagine a negative cycle in many countries when it comes to their water and development.  Let me explain: water causes development (economic and social) and development increases access to water.  Hence, my thoughts and confusions are with the countries that do not have the water (in terms of quantity, quality or affordability) to attract inves