Blog 2: Initial Thoughts on Water and Politics Continued

 

Initial Thoughts on Water and Politics Continued 

As I have continued to read on the topic of Water and Politics, I realise the inherent assumptions in my previous blog post. My main question was 'how do you develop as a society if you do not have the appropriate water sources, while there is an inability to increase to improve water sources due to the lack of development in your society?' My argument misses out on a key piece of information: while countries may be considered 'developing', their governments always have a money tree. Secondly, my question and thought process was not nuanced enough - I should have outlined specific 'water sources' that attract financial investment and increase development throughout a country. For example, many developing countries rely on agriculture for their livelihoods; therefore, many must rely on irrigation to some extent. The question is more about, do they have the development required for large-scale infrastructures tied to development processes such as dams. This question has two answers, the first being: not all large-scale infrastructures increase development levels. The second is politics. 

I came to understand this when reading Tawfik, R. (2016) 'Reconsidering counter-hegemonic dam projects: the case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam', Water Policy, 18, 1033-1052. While the article gives some validity to my question, noting that 'Ethiopia lacked the political, diplomatic, institutional, technical and economic capacity to implement' a project as large as the GERD (image below), the ability for such a development project was aided via political means. For example, not only did Ethiopia acquire support from the Sudanese for stronger support against Egypt (who had the majority of control over the Nile), Ethiopia proposed the GERD plan as political strife raged in Egypt. This was obviously a clear tactical move on the political chessboard as it delayed Eygpt's response to the water source they believed to have more rights over.  And so, to answer my question from the first blog post and aid this blog development, I can say: the answer is always political - no matter the lack of finances, development or level of democracy, there is always a political game to be played in the water world.



Comments

  1. ClementNovember 10, 2022 at 2:59 PM

    You have demonstrated a reasonable grasp of water and political issue, and shown evidence of some relevant reading but your referencing did not follow the suggested format.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 3: COP27: 'Water Politics' or Just 'Politics'...

Image
COP27: 'Water Politics' or Just 'Politics'...  Csaba Kőrösi, the President of the UN General Assembly claimed the 2022 COP ‘ is the water COP .’ However, is this really true? Introduction:  Problems with the global water supply and distribution are inextricably linked to climate change - ‘ 3.6 billion people face inadequate access to water at least a month per year… [which] is expected to increase to more than 5 billion by 2050’. This is more than half of the entire population on Earth set to experience problems with access to water. Indeed, already 1 out of 10 people cannot rely on their water sources for clean water. This is set to increase as the consequences of climate change become more intense: more pollution, prolonged droughts, more dry wells and more dangerous weather events.  Africa is at the heart of the water crisis. It is said that ‘without accelerated action, ‘ 80% of African nations are unlikely to have sustainably managed water resources by 2030 .’ In f...
Read more

Blog 4: Unstable Futures: The Curse of the River Nile

Image
Blog 4: Unstable Futures: The Curse of the River Nile  Political History of the Nile:  The River Nile played a critical and strategic role in Egypt. It encouraged the blossoming of civilisations during the Pharaonic period, allowing the country to command great political power as ‘the part of Africa that receives its source of life ( Tayia et al, 2021: 299) .’ A short and concise history of Nile politics. The Nile politics we know today is very much influenced by the happenings of 19th and 20th-century European imperialism. Under British colonial rule, the River Nile was protected by the empire ( Swain, 2011: 690 ), which was also involved in the distribution of its waters, too. In 1959, it was decided that the downstream nations of Egypt and Sudan would get most of the Nile’s water, with ‘ 48 billion cubic metres going to Egypt and 4 billion to Sudan .’ This agreement also prevented Ethiopia from building dams along the river. The political obsession with the Nile continued ...
Read more